Inthira v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Queen's Bench judicial bench quashed a criminal complaint (C.C. No. 38 of 2021) under Section 482 CrPC after finding no prima facie evidence and confirming the petitioner was absent during the alleged incident.
What did the court decide?
Criminal complaint C.C. No. 38 of 2021 pending before Judicial Magistrate No.1 Sankari is quashed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.01.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
CRL.OP No. 1367 of 2022
& Crl.MP. No. 538 & 540 of 2022
- 1 INTHIRA [ W/O MATHIYAN MOOLAPATHI ARASIRAMANI VILLAGE SANKARI TALUK SALEM DISTRICT
PETITIONER
Vs
- 1 STATE REP BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THEVOOR POLICE STATION SALEM DISTRICT
- 2 SARAVANAN S/O PERUMAL VELLAIPILLAYRKOIL KAVERIPATTI SANKARI TALUK SALEM DISTRICT
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal complaint should be quashed when the petitioner was absent at the time of the alleged occurrence and there is no prima facie evidence against her.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Inthira
- respondent
State Rep by Sub Inspector of Police Thevoor
- respondent
Saravanan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court