Disposed
V.Rukmani v. the Tahsildar
Madras HCWMP/35932/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner sought restoration of a dismissed Writ Petition after a video conferencing technical issue prevented appearance. Court ordered the writ petition listed for prosecution. No legal reasoning provided.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition restored and ordered to be listed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
WMP.No.35932 of 2023 in W.P.No.33476 of 2023
¶2
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
¶3
This petition has been filed to restore the Writ Petition which was dismissed for non prosecution.
¶4
- The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that as he was not able come in person, he attempted appear through video conferencing, due to technical issues the 'unmute' option did not work, the Writ Petition has been dismissed for non prosecution and no representation for the petitioner is neither wilful nor wanton.
¶5
- Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed along with the petition and in order to give an opportunity to the petitioner to prosecute the case, this petition is Ordered.
¶6
04.07.2024
Coram
AI extract
N. SATHISH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court