A one-paragraph miscellaneous petition order allowing impleadment of a necessary party in a pending writ petition; no proposition of general application is decided.
Proposed respondent N.Anbazhagan impleaded as party respondent to the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.M.P.No.3092 of 2023 in W.P.No.1243 of 2023
N.SATHISH KUMAR.J.,
This miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner in the writ petition seeking to implead one N.Anbazhagan Son of Nagappan as party respondent to the writ petition.
Perused the affidavit filed in support of the miscellaneous petition. The petitioner claims to be the power agent of the proposed respondent. Considering the avermnets made in the affidavit filed in support of the miscellaneous petition and other facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the view that the 3rd respondent is a necessary party to the writ petition. This petition is ordered accordingly.
27..06..2024
Note: The Registry is directed to carryout necessary amendment in the writ petition
1 of 2
N.SATHISH KUMAR.J.,
kmk
W.M.P.No.3092 of 2023 in
W.P.No.1243 of 2023
27..06..2024
2 of 2
Petitioner in W.P.No.1243 of 2023
N.SATHISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
