Disposed

S.Venkatesan @ Gopu, v. the District Collector

Madras HC26 Jun 2024WP/11327/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought cancellation of a patta issued due to an error in recording extent under a partition deed. The Court directed the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation on merits after notice to the current patta holder within two months.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation within two months after notice.

S.Venkatesan @ Gopu, Vs the District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.11327 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 26.06.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.11327 of 2024

¶7

S.Venkatesan @ Gopu .. Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1.The District Collector District Collector office Tiruvannamalai Tiruvannamalai District

¶10

2.The District Revenue Officer District Revenue Office Tiruvannamalai Tiruvannamalai District

¶11

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Division Office Cheyyar Tiruvannamalai District

¶12

4.The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office Chetpet Tiruvannamalai District 5.G.Ravichandran

¶13

6.Thara .. Respondents

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶15

W.P.No.11327 of 2024

¶16

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.08.2023 to cancel patta No.197 in respect of Survey No. 56/2A, Chetpet, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkatesan For R1 to R4 : Mr.A.Sathish Additional Government Pleader For R5 & R6 : No appearance

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents 1 to

¶20

4 to cancel the patta No.197, in respect of Survey No. 56/2A, Chetpet,

¶21

Thiruvannamalai District, by disposing of the petitioner's representation dated

¶22

14.08.2023

¶23

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the

¶24

learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 and perused the materials placed on record.

¶25

According to the petitioner, his paternal grandfather vide Partition Deed dated 01.10.1965, out of 6.26 cents extent in S.No.56/2, settled 3.33 cents

¶26

in favour of his father Srinivasan and the remaining extent of 2.93 cents in

¶27

2/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.No.11327 of 2024

¶30

favour of his uncle Govindaraj. However, UDR patta was mistakenly issued to Srinivasan in respect of 2.72 cents and to Govindaraj in respect of 3.54 cents. In order to rectify the said error, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 14.08.2023 to the respondents 1 to 4. Since no action has been taken by the respondents on the said representation, he has filed the present writ petition.

¶31

Considering the limited relief sought in this writ petition, there shall be a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 14.08.2023 and pass orders on its own merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to the person in whose name the present patta stands, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶32

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶33

26.06.2024

¶34

gya

¶35

Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No

¶36

¶37

1.The District Collector District Collector office Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

3/4

¶40

W.P.No.11327 of 2024

¶41

2.The District Revenue Officer District Revenue Office Tiruvannamalai Tiruvannamalai District

¶42

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶43

gya

¶44

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Division Office Cheyyar Tiruvannamalai District

¶45

4.The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office Chetpet Tiruvannamalai District

¶46

W.P.No.11327 of 2024

¶47

26.06.2024

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

4/4

S.Venkatesan @ Gopu, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Venkatesan @ Gopu, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gunasekaran Vs The Inspector General of Registration

S.Thangamani, Vs Union of India

K.Malarvizhi Vs The commissioner

Vasuki Vs the Sub Registrar

Dr.K.Raghavendhar Karthik Vs the Commissioner

S.Kamarudeen Vs the District Collector