The Madurai bench dismissed the Writ Appeals as infructuous after the appellant's counsel filed an endorsement claiming the prayers sought were no longer viable.
The Writ Appeals were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 06.02.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
W.A(MD)Nos.990 and 991 of 2012
Sri Ram Candles,
represented by its Proprietor R.Renganathan No.51, Park East Street, Kovilpatti – 628 501, Tuticorin District. ... Petitioner/Appellant in both W.As’
.Vs.
1/4
COMMON PRAYER: Writ Appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act praying this Court to set aside the orders passed by this Court in W.P(MD)Nos. 3731 and 3732 of 2012, dated 21.08.2012.
| For Appellant | : Mr.A.Chandrasekaran |
|---|---|
| in both W.As’ | |
| For Respondents | : Mr.D.Sachikumar |
| in both W.As’ | Addl.Govt.Pleader |
JUDGMENT
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN,J.
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the prayer sought for in the Writ Appeals become infructuous and that the Writ Appeals become infructuous and has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the above, these Writ Appeals are dismissed as infructuous. There is no order as to costs.
[G.J.,J.] [C.K.,J.] 06.02.2024
2/4
NCS : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No
vsn
To
3/4
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. and C.KUMARAPPAN,J.
vsn
JUDGMENT MADE IN
W.A(MD)Nos.990 and 991 of 2012
06.02.2024
4/4
Sri Ram Candles
The State of Tamil Nadu
G.Jayachandran
C.Kumarappan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
