K.Muniyandi v. v.Rasu Gounder
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a Writ Appeal filed under the Letters Patent for non-prosecution as the appellant's counsel was absent on the date of hearing, leaving the prayer infructuous.
What did the court decide?
The writ appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution; connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
What the court decided
W.A.(MD)No.95 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.08.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
W.A.(MD)No.95 of 2019 and
C.M.P(MD)No.640 and 641 of 2019
K.Muniyandi
: Appellant/Petitioner
Vs.
1.V.Rasu Gounder
- 2.The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
- 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.Muniyandi
- respondent
V.Rasu Gounder
- respondent
The District Collector, Dindigul District
- respondent
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court