I.Prakash v. P.Anbalagan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench dismissed a Writ Appeal filed under the Letters Patent Act as infructuous following an endorsement by the appellant's counsel. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
Writ Appeal dismissed as infructuous. Connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 19.08.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
W.A(MD)No.1541 of 2018 and C.M.P(MD)No.10977 of 2018
I.Prakash, Madurai Entertainment, 50, T.P.K.Road, Main Road Pykara, Madurai – 14. ... Appellant/Third Respondent
.Vs.
1.P.Anbalagan, Son of Periyasamy Thevar, Proprietor Thaai Entertainment, 346, Tiruvalluvar Nagar, Thirunagar, Thanakkankulam Post, Madurai – 625 006.
...Ist Respondent/Writ Petitioner
- 2.Madurai City Municipal Corporation, represented by its Commissioner, Arignar Anna Maligai Outpost, Thallakulam, Madurai.
- 1/4
Parties & counsel
- appellant
I.Prakash
- respondent
P.Anbalagan
- respondent
Madurai City Municipal Corporation
- respondent
The Assistant Commissioner (Pani)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court