The Division Bench dismissed the writ appeal challenging the rejection of the appellant's claim for permanent absorption. The Court held that no documents were placed on record to prove the petitioner's working relationship with the respondents, and factual disputes regarding employment and termination could not be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 11.06.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
W.A.(MD) No.804 of 2018 and C.M.P.(MD) No.4799 of 2018
A.Arumuga Nainar
... Appellant
-vs-
... Respondents
Page 1 of 6
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order, dated 08.03.2018, passed in W.P.(MD) No.3806 of 2012 on the file of this Court.
For Appellants : Mr.Deepak Arasu for Mr.H.Arumugam For Respondents : Ms.P.Malini for M/s.T.S.Gopalan
J U D G M E N T
[Judgment of the Court was made by A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.]
This Writ Appeal has been filed as against the order passed by the learned Single Judge, dismissing the writ petition challenging the order of rejection in relation to the claim of the writ petitioner for permanent absorption.
Page 2 of 6
Electricity Board and thereby not entitled for absorption, had rejected the claim of the petitioner. Challenging the same, the present Writ appeal has been filed.
Page 3 of 6
thereby the appellant is not entitled for any absorption and thereby the learned Single Judge has rightly dismissed the petition.
[A.D.J.C., J.] [K.R.S., J.]
11.06.2024
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No aav
Page 4 of 6
To:
Page 5 of 6
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. AND K.RAJASEKAR, J.
aav
W.A.(MD) No.804 of 2018 and C.M.P.(MD) No.4799 of 2018
11.06.2024
_____________ Page 6 of 6_
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was entitled to permanent absorption in the Board's service?
A.Arumuga Nainar
The Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
The Chief Engineer/Personnel Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
The Superintendent Engineer Wing Energy Development Cell Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
The Superintending Engineer TANGEDCO Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
K.RAJASEKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
