Meenakshi v. N.Lalitha
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed an appeal against a Writ Court order that remanded a dispute over temple pooja rights back to the Joint Commissioner for an initial enquiry and fresh hearing of all parties.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Joint Commissioner to conduct an enquiry on the basis of the representation dated 22.04.2011 and dispose of it within four months after issuing fresh notice to all parties.
What the court decided
W.A.(MD) No.1379 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 11.06.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
W.A.(MD) No.1379 of 2017
and
C.M.P(MD)No.9836 of 2017
and
C.M.P(MD)Nos.5629, 5632 & 5634 of 2024
1.Meenakshi
- 2.Perumal Pallavarayar (died)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order directing the Commissioner to hear the revision petition afresh after the original petitioner's death should be set aside in favor of sending it back to the Joint Commissioner for in
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Meenakshi
- appellant
Perumal Pallavarayar (died)
- appellant
Muthu Anandan
- appellant
Chandra Sekar
- appellant
Selvam
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court