IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS…
Single Judge's order set aside, writ petition allowed, District Registrar's order dated 17.04.2023 quashed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.A.No.2216 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.10.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR AND
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE
W.A.No.2216 of 2024 and
C.M.P.No.15633 of 2024
Rani Raju
... Appellant
Vs.
... Respondents
Prayer:- Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 10.08.2023 in W.P.No.23563 of 2023 on the file of this Court.
Page 1
W.A.No.2216 of 2024
For Appellant : M/s.M.Abbiraami For R1 to R3 : Mr.B.Vijay Additional Government Pleader For R4 : Mr.Krishna Ravindran for Mr.Kavin Prabhu
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment was delivered by S.S. SUNDAR, J. )
This Writ Appeal is directed against the order of learned Single Judge, dated 10.08.2023, in W.P.No.23563 of 2023 filed by the appellant for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the impugned order dated 17.04.2023 and consequently, direct the respondents 1 to 3 to delete the document remarks made in Encumbrance Certificate with regard to S.F.No.112/4 in Kattoor Village, Thiruvarur Taluk.
2.The appellant/writ petitioner challenged the order of District
Registrar in exercise of power under Section 77-A of the Registration Act. The case of the appellant is that the District Registrar has no jurisdiction to cancel the document, since the document was registered long back. The
Page 2
W.A.No.2216 of 2024
learned Single Judge, holding that an order passed under Section 77-A is subject to an appeal, disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the appellant to exhaust the appellate remedy as provided under the Statute.
3.This Court, in a batch of writ petitions in M.Kathirvel v. Inspector General of Registration and others [W.P.No.10291 of 2022, etc. batch, dated 02.08.2024], struck down Section 77-A of the Registration Act holding that Section 77-A is unconstitutional. This Court has also observed that Section 77-A is prospective and such a power cannot be exercised to cancel the documents which were registered long prior to the amendment, and that no enquiry can be conducted by Registrar to cancel a registered document. Therefore, the writ petition ought to have been allowed by the learned Single Judge in view of the decision of this Court striking down Section 77-A of the Registration Act.
4.Hence, this Writ Appeal is allowed and the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 10.08.2023, dismissing the writ petition in W.P.No.23563 of 2023, is set aside, and the writ petition in W.P.No.23563 of
Page 3
W.A.No.2216 of 2024
2023 stands allowed. The order impugned in the writ petition, namely, the
order passed by the District Registrar, Thiruvarur, dated 17.04.2023, is quashed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(S.S.S.R., J.) (A.D.M.C., J.) 21.10.2024
mkn
Internet : Yes Index : Yes Neutral Citation : Yes
To
Page 4
W.A.No.2216 of 2024
S.S. SUNDAR, J. and Dr.A.D. MARIA CLETE, J.
mkn
W.A.No.2216 of 2024
21.10.2024
Page 5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the District Registrar could cancel a long-registered document under Section 77-A of the Registration Act, which this Court had struck down as unconstitutional.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M.Kathirvel v. Inspector General of RegistrationFollowed¶3
M.Kathirvel v. Inspector General of Registration and others [W.P.No.10291 of 2022, etc. batch, dated 02.08.2024]
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rani Raju
The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai
The District Registrar (Audit), Thiruvarur
The Sub-Registrar, Thiruvarur
Pasaloor Rahaman
S.S. Sundar
A.D. Maria Clete
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
