A.Rajasekar v. N.Kothai
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment allows a Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 12-day delay in filing a writ appeal. The court found the explanation satisfactory and directed registry action.
What did the court decide?
The delay of 12 days in filing the writ appeal is condoned.
What the court decided
CMP.NO.21851/2024 IN WA.SR.No.121469/2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 18.10.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE
CMP.No.21851/2024 in WA.SR.No.121469/2024
1.A.Rajasekar 2.P.Kesavan 3.K.Narend 4.K.Ganesh
..Petitioners
Versus
1.N.Kothai 2.The District Revenue Officer Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act sufficiently explains the delay of 12 days to condone the same for filing the writ appeal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1.A.Rajasekar 2.P.Kesavan 3.K.Narend 4.K.Ganesh
- respondent
1.N.Kothai 2.The District Revenue Officer Kancheepuram Kancheepuram District 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Kancheepuram Kancheepuram District 4.The Tahsildar
Coram
S.S.SUNDAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court