Disposed

The Member Secretary v. M.Rajamanickam

Madras HC14 Feb 2024WA/2155/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ appeal by acquiring authorities against an order directing payment of the awarded compensation within twelve weeks. The court noted that a first appeal against the Reference Court's award is pending with a stay and 50% deposited, and held the impugned order cannot be implemented while the stay operates; if the stay is vacated, the order would operate.

What the court decided

AI extract

The Member Secretary Vs M.Rajamanickam — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.A.No.2155 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 14.02.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶7

W.A.No.2155 of 2023

¶8

1.The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, (Chennai Outer Ring Road Scheme)

¶9

No.8, Gandhi Irwin Road,

¶10

Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

¶11

2.The Special Tahsildar (LA), and Land Acquisition Officer Unit IV, Chennai Outer Ring Road Scheme, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Koyambedu, Chennai-600 107.

¶12

.. Appellants

¶13

Vs.

¶14

1.M.Rajamanickam

¶15

2.Tamil Nadu Road Development Company Ltd., rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director, 171, II Floor, Tamil Nadu Maritime Board Bldg., South Kesava Perumal Puram, Pasumpon Muthuramalingam Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600 028. ..

¶16

.. Respondents

¶17

Page 1 of 5

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.A.No.2155 of 2023

¶20

Prayer : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 13.4.2022 passed in W.P.No.9184 of 2022.

¶21

For the Appellants : Mr.P.Kumaresan Addl. Advocate-General assisted by Mrs.P.Veena Suresh

¶22

For the Respondents : Dr.R.Maheswari for respondent No.1

¶23

: Mr.M.Sivavarthanan for respondent No.2

¶24

JUDGMENT

¶25

(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶26

We have heard Mr.P.Kumaresan, learned Additional Advocate-

¶27

General, assisted by Mrs.P.Veena Suresh, learned counsel for the appellants; Dr.R.Maheshwari, learned counsel for the first respondent; and, Mr.M.Sivavarthanan, learned counsel for the second respondent.

¶28

The present writ appeal is filed against the order of the learned Single Judge, wherein the learned Single Judge, upon the writ

¶29

Page 2 of 5

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.A.No.2155 of 2023

¶32

petition filed by the first respondent, directed to pay the amount under the award within twelve weeks.

¶33

It is contended by learned Additional Advocate-General that the first appeal against the award passed by the Reference Court is filed and the same is pending before this Court. Stay has been granted and 50% of the amount is deposited. In view of that, the impugned order may not be proper.

¶34

As the stay is operating in favour of the present appellants,

¶35

the order under this appeal cannot be implemented.

¶36

It is submitted that the original writ petitioner has withdrawn 50% of the amount under the award.

¶37

Till the stay order is operating in the first appeal filed by the appellants, the order under this appeal may not be implemented. In case, the stay is vacated in the first appeal, then the order under appeal would be operated.

¶38

Page 3 of 5

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.A.No.2155 of 2023

¶41

In view of the above, the writ appeal is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, C.M.P.No.18443 of 2023 is closed.

¶42

(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 14.02.2024 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr

¶43

¶44

The Chairman & Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Road Development Company Ltd., 171, II Floor, Tamil Nadu Maritime Board Bldg., South Kesava Perumal Puram, Pasumpon Muthuramalingam Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600 028.

¶45

Page 4 of 5

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

W.A.No.2155 of 2023

¶48

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

bbr

W.A.No.2155 of 2023

14.02.2024

Page 5 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

The Member Secretary v. M.Rajamanickam

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

The Member Secretary v. M.Rajamanickam

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd, Vs K. Kalavathi

Sarasal Vs The Secretary to Government

Dhanam Vs the District Collector

M.Venkatasalam Vs the Commissioner

The Project Director Vs Chan Basha

G.S.Badri Narayanan Vs the Principal Secretary