a specific plea that the suit property originally belonged to the first and second plaintiffs' father Suruliandi, and after this death, the plaintiffs had been in possession and enjoyment of the suit property. In support of the said plea, the plaintiffs failed to produce any title document to prove that the property belonged to the fist and second plaintiffs' father Suruliandi either by self acquisition or by succession. The only document filed by the plaintiffs in support of their case is the revenue document, namely, Town Survey Register marked as Ex-A1. A perusal of Ex-A1, would suggest that it stands in the name of Subban and Karuppiah, sons of Suruliandi. The plaintiffs have not produced any documents to show that the property belonged to their father Suruliandi, as per their plaint averment. It is settled that revenue documents will not confer any title. Further, merely because, revenue documents stand in the name of one of the members of the branch of the family, the person in whose name revenue documents stand cannot claim exclusive right over the property. In the case on hand, the defendants claimed that the plaintiffs' Grandfather, Subban and father of the defendants were brother. The appellants/plaintiffs only produced the Town Survey Register, which stands in their name and there is no evidence available on record to show how the plaintiffs got the property. Both the Courts below non suited the
