K.Subramani v. Dhanam Ammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal under Section 100 CPC dismissed as settled out of court between the parties. No costs were imposed.
What the court decided
S.A(MDNo.365 of 2007
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 16.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)No.365 of 2007 and C.M.P(MD) No.2 of 2007
K.Subramani ...Appellant
-Vs-
1.Dhanam Ammal
2.Krishnasamy Gounder 3.Kesavaraj 4.Sakthivel 5.Joonu 6.Chandrasekar ... Respondents
(Respondents 3 to 6 are only tenants and remained ex-parte before the Courts below. Hence, they are given up in this second appeal as unnecessary parties)
PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 05.12.2002 passed in A.S.No.112 of 2001 on the file of the Additional District Judge cum Chief
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.Subramani
- respondent
Dhanam Ammal
- respondent
Krishnasamy Gounder
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court