Second Appeal was dismissed because the appellant did not press the appeal. The single judge delivered a memorandum recording the lack of appearance and dismissal without costs.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :04.06.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)NO.265 OF 2008
A.Ramalingam :Appellant/Ist Respondent/Plaintiff
.vs.
1.A.Muhuirulandi
2.M.Lakshmi
3.A.Lakshmi(died)
4.Pethammal
5.Muthupechi
(Memo in U.S.R.No.15119, dated 18.04.2024 is recorded to the effect that R3 died vide order of this Court made in S.A(MD)No. 565 of 2008, dated 18.04.2024)
(R3 died and the sole appellant and respondents 1,4 and 5 who are already on record, are recorded as the legal representatives of the deceased R3 vide order of this Court made in S.A(MD)No.565 of 2008, dated 18.04.2024)
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.12 of 2007, dated 5.11.2007, on the file of learned Subordinate Judge, Aruppukkottai by modifying and confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.281 of 2003, dated 9.11.2003, on the file of learned District Munsif, Aruppukkottai.
2
For Appellant :Mr.S.Parthasarathy For Respondents :No appearance
**JUDGMENT ***************
The learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo not
pressing the Second Appeal.
2.Recording the memo, the Second Appeal is dismissed as not
pressed. No costs.
04.06.2024
Index:Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
NCC:Yes/No
vsn
To
3
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
vsn
JUDGMENT MADE IN S.A(MD)NO.565 OF 2008
04.06.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Ramalingam
1.A.Muhuirulandi
2.M.Lakshmi
3.A.Lakshmi(died)
4.Pethammal
5.Muthupechi
S.SOONTHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
