Dismissed
Subramaniya Nattar (Died) v. Nataraja Madan
Madras HCSA/104/2002
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03.06.2024…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :03.06.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A.NO.104 OF 2002
1.Subramania Nattar(died)
2.Mangayarkarasi
6.Kalyani :Defendant/Respondent/Appellants
.vs.
1,Nataraja Madam,
represented by Arumugam(died), son of Parimala Gounder
2.A.Shanmuga Sundaram
3.Selvi
4.Ponraman :Plaintiff/Appellant/Respondents
(Second respondent was brought on record as LR of the deceased sole respondent as per order of this Court made in M.P(MD)No.1 to 3 of2008 in S.A.No.104 of 2002, dated 09.03.2016)
(Appellants 2 to 6 are brought on record as Lrs of the deceased sole appellant and respondents 3 and 4 are brought on record as legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant as per order of this Court made in M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014 in S.A.NO.104 of 2002, dated 9.3.2016)
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure
2
Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.47 of 2000, dated 31.07.2001,on the file of Additional Subordinate Judges Court, Thanjavur, reversing the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.68 of 1999, dated 17.8.2000, on the file of District Munsif Court, Thiruvayyaru.
For Appellants :No appearance For Respondent-1 :Died For Respondent-2 :Mr.G.Sridharan
**JUDGMENT ***************
When the Second Appeal was taken up for hearing on 23.01.2024, the learned counsel for the appellants submitted that he had handed over the papers along with change of vakalath to the parties. He also filed a memo to that effect. Thereafter, the Registry was directed to print the names of the appellants in the cause-list.Today, the Second Appeal is listed by printing the names of the appellants in the cause-list. There is no representation for the appellants. The learned counsel for the second respondent is present and he is ready to get along with the Second appeal.
2.Therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No
costs.
03.06.2024
3
Index:Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No
4
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
vsn
JUDGMENT MADE IN S.A.NO.104 OF 2002
03.06.2024
Mangayarkarasi
Indira
Muthu Rasu
Gunasekaran
Kalyani
Nataraja Madam
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court