Rajammal v. Malayee
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal against confirmation of a District Munsif decree; the sole appellant died and the delay in setting aside abatement was not cured after costs were imposed, so the appeal stood abated.
What the court decided
SA.(MD)No.383 of 2004
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 25.11.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
SA.(MD)No.383 of 2004 Rajammal ... Appellant Vs. Malayaee ... Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Cr.P.C., against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.218 of 1989 on the file of I Additional District Court, Madurai, dated 12.03.2004 in confirming the judgment and decree of the Madurai Taluk District Munsif Court, Madurai in O.S.No.621 of 1987 dated 12.09.1989.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Kadarkarai For Respondent : Mr.T.M.Hariharan
JUDGMENT
This second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.218 of 1989 on the file of I Additional District Court, Madurai, dated 12.03.2004 in confirming the judgment and decree of the Madurai Taluk District Munsif Court, Madurai in O.S.No.621 of 1987 dated 12.09.1989.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajammal
- respondent
Malayaee
Coram
V.Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court