S.Rathinam v. Esakkiammal
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant, filing a second appeal under Section 100 of the CPC, informed the court that he did not wish to prosecute the appeal. The court dismissed the second appeal for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
S.A(MD)No.454 of 2007
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 27.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
S.A(MD)No.454 of 2007 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2007
S.Rathinam ... 2nd Defendant / 2nd respondent / Appellant
Vs
1.Esakkiammal 2.Chandra 3.Esakki Asari 4.S.Mani ... Respondents
Prayer : This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., to allow the Second Appeal and set aside the judgment and decree dated 22.01.2007 made in A.S.No.38 of 2006 on the file of the Sub Court, Kovilpatti, reversing the judgment and decree dated 02.12.2005 made in O.S.No.76/2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kovilpatti.
For Appellants : Mr.P.T.S.Narendra Vasan For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.Hemakarthikeyan
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S.Rathinam
- respondent
Esakkiammal
- respondent
Chandra
- respondent
Esakki Asari
- respondent
S.Mani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court