Perumal Konar v. the Revenue Divisional Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeals filed under Section 100 CPC were dismissed for default as the appellants failed to appear despite being granted an opportunity to be heard.
Second appeals filed under Section 100 CPC were dismissed for default as the appellants failed to appear despite being granted an opportunity to be heard.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :10.06.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)Nos233 and 234 2008
:Appellants/Respondents/Plaintiffs in S.A(MD)No.233 of 2008
1.Neelavathi
: Appellant/Respondent/Plaintiff in S.A(MD)No.234 of 1008
.vs.
:Respondents/Respondents 5 to 7, Appellants/Defendants in both appeals
COMMON PRAYER: Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgments and decrees made in
2
A.S.Nos.25 and 26 of 2005, dated 31.03.2006, on the file of Subordinate Judge, Pudukkottai reversing the judgment and decree made in O.S.Nos.124 and 127 of 2003, dated 23.07.2004, on the file of Principal District Munsif, Pudukkottai.
For Appellant/s :No appearance in both appeals
For Respondents :Mr.SRA.Ramachandran 1 to 3 in both appeals
For Respondent-4 :No appearance S.A(MD)No.233 of 2008
COMMON JUDGMENT
When the Second Appeals came up for hearing on 25.04.2024, there was no representation for the appellants and hence, in order to give an opportunity to the appellants, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption ‘’for dismissal’’ today. Today, the matter is listed under the caption ‘’for dismissal’’. Even today, there is no representation for the appellants.
3.Hence, the Second Appeals are dismissed for default. No costs.
10.06.2024
3
Index:Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No
vsn To
4
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
vsn
COMMON JUDGMENT MADE IN S.A(MD)Nos233 and 234 2008
10.06.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Perumal Konar
Ravichandran
Meyyappan
Rajendran
Neelavathi
The Revenue Divisional officer, Pudukkottai
S.SOUNTHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court