Dismissed

Karuppana Gounder v. Seetha

Madras HC10 Jun 2024SA(MD)/1150/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a second appeal for default on 10.06.2024. The appellant failed to appear despite the matter being listed for dismissal. No arguments were presented, and the court recorded no instructions for the appellant.

What did the court decide?

The Second Appeal was dismissed for default. Connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed. No costs awarded.

Karuppana Gounder Vs Seetha — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED :10.06.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

¶6

S.A(MD)No.1150 OF 2008 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2008

¶7

Karuppana Gounder :Appellant/Appellant/Defendant

¶8

.vs.

¶9

Seetha :Respondent/Respondent/

¶10

Plaintiff

¶11

PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.35 of 2006, dated 11.08.2008, on the file of Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul, confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.147 of 1999, dated 18.01.2006, on the file of District Munsif- cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Vedasandur.

¶12

For Appellant :No appearance

¶13

For Respondent :Mr.G.Gomathi Sankar

¶14

**JUDGMENT ***************

¶15

It is seen from the records that the Second Appeal was dismissed for default on 28.01.2010 for the non-appearance of the appellant and thereafter, on appliation, it has been restored to file.

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

¶18

2.When the matter came up for hearing on 07.06.2024, the

¶19

learned counsel for the appellant reported’’no instructions’’ and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. Recording the same, the Registrgy was directed to list the Second Appeal under the caption ‘’for dismissal’’ today. Today, the matter is listed under the caption ‘’for dismissal’’by printing the name of the appellant in the cause-list. Even today, there is no representation for the appellant.

¶20

3.Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No

¶21

costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶22

10.06.2024

¶23

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No

¶24

vsn

¶25

¶26

1.The Principal Sub-Judge, Dindigul.

¶27

2.The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur.

¶28

3.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

vsn

JUDGMENT MADE IN S.A(MD)No.1150 OF 2008 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2008

¶34

10.06.2024

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Karuppana Gounder v. Seetha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karuppana Gounder v. Seetha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Ramadoss Vs Rajangam

Muthirulandi Vs a.Ramalingam

K.Subash Chandra Bose Vs the District Backward Class

Chithiraisamy Vs Sundara Thevar

P.Thavasimuthu Vs a.Thangaraj

Perumal Konar Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer