V.Mani v. The Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras disposed of a second appeal filed by an unsuccessful plaintiff claiming hereditary trusteeship of a private temple, dismissing the appeal as it raised no substantial question of law.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal stands dismissed with no costs.
What the court decided
S.A.No.904 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.02.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
S.A.No.904 of 2023
V.Mani
... Appellant
Vs.
- 1.The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Chennai – 34.
- 2.The Joint Commissioner
- Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Villupuram.
- 3.The Inspector Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Vandavasi.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the second appeal raises any substantial question of law regarding the appellant's right to manage the temple as Hereditary Trustee.
Whether the judgment and decree in A.S.No.196 of 1982 acts as a bar to the present claim for Hereditary Trusteeship.
Whether the finding of the lower courts that the appellant failed to prove hereditary trusteeship warrants interference.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V.Mani
- respondent
The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Chennai
- respondent
The Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Villupuram
- respondent
The Inspector Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Vandavasi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court