Mallan v. Rajammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed as the appellants counsel repeatedly failed to appear for hearings and was unwilling to argue the matter, leading to dismissal for default with costs.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for default with costs.
What the court decided
S.A.No.78 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.09.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
S.A.No.78 of 2020
- Arumugam
- Palani ... Appellants Vs
Rajammal ... Respondent
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, praying to set aside the Decree and Judgement dated 13.02.2019 passed in A.S.No.93 of 2017 on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem Confirming the Decree and Judgement dated 31.08.2017 passed in O.S. No.889 of 2013 by the Principal District Munsif Court at Salem by allowing this Second Appeal.
For Appellants : Mr.A.Prithviraj for Mr.R.Nalliyappan
For Respondent : Mr.V.Sekar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Arumugam (R.Nalliyappan)
- appellant
Palani
- respondent
Rajammal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court