Application in a pending second appeal seeking to set aside abatement was considered. The court found the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the petition satisfactory and allowed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.21114 of 2024 in
S.A.No.708 of 2018
R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
Mr.S.Parthasarathy, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr.Dinesh Kumar, representing counsel for
Mr.P.Venkatraman, counsel for R2, are before this Court.
raja 25.09.2024 (1/4)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application to set aside the abatement should be allowed on the reasons stated in the supporting affidavit.
R.Sakthivel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
