Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant did not appear, while respondent's counsel was present.
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.770 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
S.A. No.770 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.15789 of 2022
Pannerselvam
... Appellant
..Vs..
Anandan @ Satchidanandame ... Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 24.03.2022 in A.S.No.85/2018 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Puducherry, upholding the decree and judgment dated 11.10.2018 in O.S.No.221/2008 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Puducherry.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.Thanjai P N Chezhian
JUDGMENT
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no
representation for the appellant. The counsel for the respondent is present.
1/2
S.A.No.770 of 2022
R. HEMALATHA, J.
vum
2. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
26.11.2024
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order vum To 1.The III Additional District Judge, Puducherry. 2.The Principal Sub Judge, Puducherry. 3.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.
S.A. No.770 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.15789 of 2022
2/2
Pannerselvam
Anandan @ Satchidanandame
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
