The High Court dismissed the second appeal for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to move for substituted service to two respondents who remained unserved.
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.102 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
S.A.No.102 of 2017
S. Meera Rani @ Krishnakumari ... Appellant
..Vs..
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 15.09.2016 in A.S.No.14 of 2013 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Gudiyatham, upholding the decree and judgment dated 25.11.2011 in O.S.No.191 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham.
For Appellant : Mr. V. Manoharan For R4 : Dr. S. Suriya Additional Government Pleader (CS)
1/3
S.A.No.102 of 2017
R. HEMALATHA, J.
bga
JUDGMENT
A perusal of the records shows that the respondents 2 and 3
have not been served with notice till date and that though the appellants were ordered to take substituted service petition to the respondents 2 and 3, necessary petition has not been filed so far.
2. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed for
non prosecution. No costs.
25.11.2024
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No bga
To
2/3
S.A.No.102 of 2017
S.A.No.102 of 2017
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the second appeal which is for non-appearance due to non-service of notice on respondents 2 and 3.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Meera Rani @ Krishnakumari
P.N. Sulochana
N. Baladhandapani
N. Jgadeesan
Vellalore Town Panchayat
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
