T.K.Subramaniam v. Rukmani
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC where appellants failed to appear. Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as it inferred the appellants were not interested in prosecuting it.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. No Costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
S.A.No.634 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.06.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
S.A.No.634 of 2021 and
C.M.P.No.13135 of 2021
1.T.K.Subramaniam 2.G.S.Thangamani ... Appellants
Vs.
Rukmani ... Respondent
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No.57 of 2017 dated 09.10.2017 on the file of the Principal District Court, Erode confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.43 of 2008 dated 04.09.2010 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Gobichettipalayam.
For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.V.P.K.Gowtham
Parties & counsel
- appellant
T.K.Subramaniam
- appellant
G.S.Thangamani
- respondent
Rukmani
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court