The appellants sought permission to withdraw a second appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC. The court, noting a joint memo and endorsement by parties, dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.51 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.10.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
S.A.No.51 of 2020
Shanmugam Naicker (died)
1/4
S.A.No.51 of 2020
PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC, pleased to set aside the judgment and decree dated 07.06.2016 made in A.S.No.24 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge at Arakkonam in confirming the judgment and decree dated 19.03.2015 made in O.S.No.364 of 2004 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif at Arakkonam, and allow the second appeal with costs.
For Appellants : Mr.Y.Jyothish Chander
JUDGMENT
Mr.Y.Jyothish Chander, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the second appeal. To that effect he
has filed a memo signed by the parties and also made an endorsement. Scanned reproduction of the same is as follows:-
2/4
S.A.No.51 of 2020
dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
14.10.2024
rna Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes / No
3/4
S.A.No.51 of 2020
To
1.The Subordinate Court, Arakkonam.
2.The District Munsif Court, Arakkonam.
R.SAKTHIVEL,J
rna
S.A.No.51 of 2020
14.10.2024
4/4
Shanmugam Naicker (died)
Saraswathy
Neelakandan
Kumar
Chidambaram
Radha
R.Sakthivel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
