cultivating the same. Even as per his evidence the plaintiff has stated that the sugarcane, which is cultivated in the defendant's land are being sent to Sugar factory and he has prior to adducing evidence sent the sugarcane to the factory 6 or 7 times. In the year 2016 he had earned a sum of Rs.20,000/- and in the current year, ie., 2017, he has earned Rs.24,000/- The evidence was given in the month of October 2017. He has also stated that from cultivating paddy he has earned nearly a sum of Rs.5,000/- to 10,000/- rupees. Therefore, the plaintiff shall provide the details of the income earned from the property to the defendant and the same shall be adjusted towards the amounts payable under decree in O.S.No.115 of 2007. In case the amount earned by the plaintiff exceeds the amount which is repayable by the defendant to the plaintiff under the decree, then the plaintiff shall pay the said sum to the defendant and in the case of failure on the part of the plaintiff to pay the money, this decree can be executed by the defendant as decree for money. The learned counsel for the defendant would submit that pursuant to orders of this Court a sum of Rs.3,99,000/- was deposited to the credit of O.S.No.115 of 2007. This sum shall also be given credit
