Ranjithammal v. D.Rani
Case brief
What is this about?
in S.A.Sr.No.68882 of 2013 P.T.ASHA, J., This
What did the court decide?
C.M.P. allowed to condone delay of 137 days; appeal numbered and listed for admission.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No.22207 of 2022 in
S.A.Sr.No.68882 of 2013
P.T.ASHA, J.,
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 137 days in filing the above appeal in S.A.Sr.No.68882 of 2013.
2.It is informed that
Mr.V.Velmurugan, learned counsel has entered appearance for the petitioner/appellant.
3.Heard Mr.M.Velmurugan, learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant and Mr.Dheeraj, learned counsel for M/s. P.V.Law Associates for respondents 1 to 3
4.The learned counsel for the respondents-1 to 3 has no objection for this petition being allowed.
- Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 137 days in filing the above appeal in S.A.Sr.No.68882 of 2013 is condoned.
- The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Tasha
- respondent
M/s. P.V. Law Associates
Coram
P.T. Asha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court