Second appeal against decrees upholding a trial court judgment; appellant absent at hearing, so the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution and the connected civil miscellaneous petition was closed, with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.458 of 2020 and CMP No.9757 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
S.A.No.458 of 2020 and CMP No.9757 of 2020
Kuppammal alias R.Banumathi ... Appellant
..Vs..
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 04.02.2020 in A.S.No.33 of 2017 on the file of the Additional District Court (FTC), Arani, Thiruvannamalai, upholding the decree and judgment dated 17.10.2014 in O.S.No.92 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Arani, Thiruvannamalai.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Ms. G. Sumitra
1/3
S.A.No.458 of 2020 and CMP No.9757 of 2020
R. HEMALATHA, J.
bga
JUDGMENT
When the case is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.
08.11.2024
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No bga
To
S.A.No.458 of 2020 and CMP No.9757 of 2020
2/3
S.A.No.458 of 2020 and CMP No.9757 of 2020
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kuppammal alias R.Banumathi
Perumal Gounder
P. Pichandi
P. Palanivel
A. Kamatchi
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
