Panneer Selvam Died v. Chinnappa Died
Case brief
What is this about?
Speaking order dismissing an unopposed second appeal for non-prosecution due to absence of counsel. No substantive legal proposition advanced.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.116 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
S.A. No.116 of 2018
Panneerselvam (died) 1. P.Rajinikanth
... Appellants
..Vs..
Chinnappa (died)
... Respondents
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 23.02.2017 in A.S.No.32/2012 on the file of the Principal District Court, Vellore, modifying the decree and judgment dated 09.01.2012 in O.S.No.80 of 2011 on the file of the Subordinate court, Vellore.
For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance
1/2
S.A.No.116 of 2018
R. HEMALATHA, J.
vum
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant reported no
instructions on 24.10.2024 in the second appeal. Hence, the Registry was directed to print the names of the appellants in the cause list. Though the name of the appellants are printed in the cause list today, there is no representation on their behalf.
No costs.
08.11.2024
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order vum
To
1.The Principal District Court, Vellore.
2.The Subordinate court, Vellore.
3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.
S.A. No.116 of 2018
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Panneerselvam (died) and others
Chinnappa (died) and others
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court