Chandrasekar v. Latchmi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a second appeal against a lower court's decree declaring the respondent's title to a suit property classified as grama natham, relying on patta No. 695 and cited State of Tamil Nadu vs. Madasamy.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as devoid of merits. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
S.A.No.271 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 25.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
S.A.No.271 of 2023 and CMP.No.7934 of 2023
Chandrasekar
.. Appellant
Vs.
Latchmi .. Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, prayed to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 28.11.2022 in A.S.No.14 of 2022 on the file of the I Additional Sub Judge, Cuddalore, confirming the judgment and decree dated 26.04.2022 in O.S.No.717 of 2004 on the file of Principal District Munsiff, Cuddalore.
For Appellant : Mr.Devaraj for Mr.K.Shanmugam For Respondent : Mr.R.Sunilkumar
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the courts below correctly appreciated the evidence regarding the validity of revenue documents issued to the plaintiff and defendant.
Whether the plaintiff had established possessory right based on material evidence to be entitled to a declaration of title.
Whether a substantial question of law is involved in the second appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.Shanmugam
- respondent
Lakshmi (as represented by Latchmi)
Coram
T.V.Thamilselvi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court