The court allowed the petition to restore a second appeal dismissed as abated, holding that the petition to bring on record the legal heirs was filed earlier and the delay in its retrieval was not willful or wanton but due to bona fide reasons.
Second Appeal restored; matter posted for further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.M.P.No. 23215 of 2024 in S.A. No. 1140 of 2006
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
This petition has been filed seeking to restore the above second appeal, which was dismissed as abated on 01.03.2024 by setting aside the said order.
restore the above S.A. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2
25.11.2024
rpp
3
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
C.M.P.No. 23215 of 2024 in S.A. No. 1140 of 2006
25.11.2024
(1/2)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased appellant was filed in time and whether the delay in retrieval was due to a bona fide reason?
Legal Heirs of Appellant
Respondent
T.V. Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
