Second appeal against concurrent decrees in a property suit; appellants' counsel filed a memo stating she could not trace them for instructions, and the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
Appeal dismissed for no instructions from plaintiffs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A. No. 1506 of 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.11.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
S.A. No.1506 of 2007
and
M.P.No. 1 of 2007
Versus
Nallasamy (died)
... Respondents
Prayer:- S econd Appeal has been filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 25.01.2007 passed by the Addl. District Judge (Fast Track Court No.IV), Bhavani, Erode District in A.S.No. 48 of 2006 confirming the decree and judgment dated 29.09.2004 passed by the II Addl. District Munsif, Bhavani in O.S.No. 593 of 2004.
1/3
S.A. No. 1506 of 2007
For Appellants : Ms.P.T.Ramadevi For Respondent : Mr.V.Rajesh
JUDGEMENT
Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel for appellants and respondent appeared. The learned counsel appearing for the Appellants submitted a memo stating that though several attempts made to find the appellants to get instructions, she could not locate them. Hence, she prayed to record this memo.
this Second Appeal is dismissed on the ground of no instructions on the side of plaintiffs. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
13.11.2024
rpp To Addl. District Court, (Fast Track Court No.IV),
2/3
S.A. No. 1506 of 2007
Bhavani, Erode Dt.
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
S.A. No. 1506 of 2007
13.11.2024
3/3
Pappal @ Ammasiammal
Mehala
Manikandan
Karunanithi
Era Durai
Sundaram
T.V. Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
