Petition filed to condone a 65-day delay in filing a Second Appeal. The Court accepted the explanation regarding summer vacation and lack of contact with counsel, allowing the petition and directing the Registry to number the appeal.
Delay of 65 days condoned; Second Appeal directed to be numbered and posted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P. No. 16958 of 2023
in
S.A.SR.No.90287 of 2023
C.M.P. No. 16958 of 2023 in S.A.SR.No.90287 of 2023
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 65 days in filing the above Second Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 09.01.2023 passed in A.S.No.81 of 2014, on the file of I Addl. District Judge, Coimbatore confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.59 of 2011 dated 17.07.2014 on the file of III Addl. Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore.
12.11.2024
rpp
C.M.P. No. 16958 of 2023 in S.A.SR.No.90287 of 2023
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
C.M.P.No. 16958 of 2023 in S.A.SR.. No. 90287 of 2023
12.11.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 65 days in filing the Second Appeal is sufficient cause for condonation?
Appellant
Respondent
T.V. THAMILSELVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
