Sundaramurthy v. Dhatchanamurthy
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed as abated because the sole appellant died and legal heirs were not impleaded within the limitation period.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as abated; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
S.A.No.1458 of 2003
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 06.11.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
S.A.No.1458 of 2003
Sundaramurthy ... Defendant/Appellant Appellant
Vs.
Dhatchanamurthy ... Plaintiff/Respondent Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.89 of 1999 on the file of the Sub Court, Kumbakonam, dated 15.10.2001, confirming the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif at Kumbakonam in O.S.No.897 of 1993, dated 29.01.1999.
For Appellant : No appearance
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sundaramurthy
- respondent
Dhatchanamurthy
Coram
V.Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court