Rajagopalan v. Ananthachari
Case brief
What is this about?
This second appeal was dismissed as abated because the sole respondent died and his legal heirs were not impleaded within the limitation period.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as abated; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
S.A.No.1378 of 2003
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 06.11.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
S.A.No.1378 of 2003
1.Rajagopalan
- 2.Jothiraman
- 3.Santharaman
- 4.Jeevan
5.Chakrapani @ Moorthy
6.Raju
7.Ravi ... Plaintiffs/Appellants Appellants 1 to 7
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajagopalan & Ors.
- respondent
Ananthachari
Coram
V.SIVAGNANAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court