Held as a default order: Second Appeal S.A. No. 1240 of 2012 dismissed because the appellant failed to appear for hearing on two dates. Connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A. No. 1240 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.11.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
S.A. No. 1240 of 2012
Uma Maheswari ...Appellant
Vs.
PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 26.04.2011 made in A.S. No. 39 of 2010 on the file of the Sub Court, Pollachi, reversing the judgment and decree dated 30.12.2009 made in O.S. No. 578 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pollachi.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.J.Ramakrishna
J U D G M E N T
There is no representation on behalf of the appellant, when the matter is
called today. Even on 05.11.2024 when the matter was taken up for hearing
1/3
S.A. No. 1240 of 2012
hearing, none appeared on behalf of the appellant, hence, the matter was ordered to be posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
18.11.2024
Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No Maya
To
S.A. No. 1240 of 2012
R.N.MANJULA, J.
Maya
S.A. No. 1240 of 2012
18.11.2024
3/3
Uma Maheswari
Subramaniam
Singarakannu
R.Balamuruganandam
R.N.MANJULA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
