A.Parvathy v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The single Second Appeal was dismissed as abated because the sole appellant died and no steps were taken to implead legal representatives despite opportunities.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed as abated. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
S.A. No.1437 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.11.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
S.A. No.1437 of 2011 and
M.P. No.1 of 2011
A.Parvathy
.. Appellant
vs
- 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 34.
- 2.The Executive Officer, Sri Komaleeswarar Temple, Komaleeswaranpettai, Chennai – 600 002. .. Respondents
Petition filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal is maintainable given the death of the sole appellant without substitution?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A.Parvathy
- respondent
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department
- respondent
The Executive Officer, Sri Komaleeswarar Temple
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court