M.Subramani v. Pushpaveniammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Substituted-service petition for the first respondent dismissed as infructuous since the vakalat was filed.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No.23309 of 2023 in S.A.No.178 of 2017
C.M.P.No.23309 of 2023
in S.A.No.178 of 2017
R.HEMALATHA, J.
This petition is filed praying to effect substituted service for the first respondent.
2.Since the vakalat for the first respondent is filed, the petition has become infructuous and is dismissed.
22.11.2024 (2/2)
mtl
Parties & counsel
- other
First respondent in S.A.No.178 of 2017
Coram
R.Hemalatha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court