Review petition filed against a judgment in a writ appeal was dismissed as not pressed upon the State's submission that subsequent orders in a related contempt petition rendered the prayer infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Rev. Appl. No.98 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.08.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
and
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Rev. Appl.No.98 of 2021
Teachers Recruitment Board, Rep. by its Member Secretary, College Road, Chennai 600 006. ... Petitioner
-vs-
Page 1 of 4
Rev. Appl. No.98 of 2021
... Respondents
PRAYER : Review Petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 114 of CPC seeking to review the judgment dated 22.02.2021 passed in W.A.No.2770 of 2019 on the file of this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Neelakandan Addl. Adv. General assisted by Mr.K.Satish Kumar, Stdg. Counsel. For Respondents : Mrs.V.Yamuna Devi, Spl. G.P. for RR 2 to 7. * * * * *
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J )
The learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the review applicant states that by virtue of the order passed subsequently in a contempt petition, the prayer in the review application becomes infructuous and therefore, the review application may be dismissed as not
pressed. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Page 2 of 4
Rev. Appl. No.98 of 2021
In view of the above, the review application is dismissed as not
pressed. No costs.
(S.S.S.R., J.) (S.S.K., J.) 07.08.2024
Index : Yes/No NC : Yes/No
sra
To
S.S.SUNDAR, J.
and
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
Page 3 of 4
Rev. Appl. No.98 of 2021
(sra)
Rev. Appl.No.98 of 2021
07.08.2024
Page 4 of 4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review application became infructuous due to a subsequent order in a contempt petition?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Teachers Recruitment Board
K.Balakrishnan
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Labour and Employment Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009
The District Employment Officer, District Employment Office, Mohanur Road, Namakkal, Namakkal District
The Professional Executive Employment Officer, (P.G.Employment Office), Madurai P.G. Employment Office, Madurai
The Commissioner of Employment & Training, Guindy, Chennai 600 032
S.S.SUNDAR
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
