The High Court dismissed a review application seeking to challenge an order in a batch of writ appeals regarding the recognition of a school. The Court held that the petitioner failed to show an error apparent on the face of the record under CPC Order 47 Rule 1.
The review application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Rev. Appl. No.168 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.08.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
and
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Rev. Appl.No.168 of 2021
I.Antony Ruban Xavier Donald
... Petitioner
-vs-
... Respondents
PRAYER : Review Petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of CPC seeking to review the order dated 27.04.2021 passed in W.A.No.1713 of 2019 on the file of this Court.
Page 1 of 4
Rev. Appl. No.168 of 2021
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Johnson For Respondents : Mr.J.C.Durairaj Addl. Govt. Pleader. * * * * *
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J )
This review application is filed seeking to review the order dated 27.04.2021 passed in W.A.No.1713 of 2019 along with a batch of writ appeals.
review application, this Court finds no merit in any of the arguments. Though the learned counsel for the review applicant relies upon two judgments, which are found in the typed set, this Court finds no relevance to any of the points on which the applicant seeks review.
under review is contrary to Section 14A of the Tamil Nadu Recognised
Page 2 of 4
Rev. Appl. No.168 of 2021
Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973. This Court is unable to appreciate the argument. The submission of the learned counsel is that Section 14A of the Act cannot be applied to vocational teachers. This submission also has no legal basis. Be that as it may, the review applicant has not raised any ground which can be considered under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC. This Court is unable to find any error apparent on the face of the record. As it has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, even where the error is not apparent but has to be detected by a process of reasoning, a review cannot be entertained.
Therefore, this review application is dismissed. No costs.
(S.S.S.R., J.) (S.S.K., J.) 07.08.2024 Index : Yes/No NC : Yes/No
sra
To
Page 3 of 4
Rev. Appl. No.168 of 2021
D.P.I.Compound, College Road, Chennai 600 006.
S.S.SUNDAR, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
(sra)
Rev. Appl.No.168 of 2021
07.08.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4 of 4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order is error apparent on the face of the record entitling the petitioner to a review.
Whether Section 14A of the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973 applies to vocational teachers.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Antony Ruban Xavier Donald
The Government of Tamil Nadu
S.S. Sundar
Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
