A review application challenging a 2015 second appeal judgment on property possession and title grounds, filed nine years later citing overlooked evidence and tax receipts. The court held the grounds exceeded the scope of review and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Rev. Appl. No. 239 of 2024 against S.A.No. 629 of 2001
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.09.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
Rev. Appl. No. 239 of 2024 against S.A.No. 629 of 2001
P.R.Manjunatha Shetti, S/o. Ramiah Chetty
... Petitioner
Versus Varalakshmi (deceased) rep. by Power Agent Durai Raja
... Respondents
Prayer:- Review Application has been filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of C.P.C. r/w 114 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to review the judgment and
decree dated 26.06.2015 passed by this Court in S.A.No.629 of 2001.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Narayanan
1/5
ORDER
Rev. Appl. No. 239 of 2024 against S.A.No. 629 of 2001
Today, when the matter came up for hearing, as the erstwhile counsel
passed away, Mr. R.Narayanan, on filing change of vakalat appeared on behalf of review applicant.
S.A.No.629 of 2001 passed by this court, this Review Application was filed.
passed by the learned Judge pronounced on 26.06.2015 on submitting the following grounds :-
2/5
Rev. Appl. No. 239 of 2024 against S.A.No. 629 of 2001
father Ramaiah Chetti had paid house tax for the suit property and the tax receipts were produced by Hansraj and Durairaj themselves.
The above grounds raised by the Review Applicant to review the judgment and decree passed by this court is beyond the scope of review application and the same was filed after the lapse of 9 years. Now, he wanted to revisit the order. If at all, the Review Applicant having aggrieved with the findings
3/5
Rev. Appl. No. 239 of 2024 against S.A.No. 629 of 2001
11.09.2024
rpp
4/5
Rev. Appl. No. 239 of 2024 against S.A.No. 629 of 2001
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
Rev. Appl. No. 239 of 2024 against S.A.No. 629 of 2001
11.09.2024
5/5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the judgment and decree dated 26.06.2015 in S.A.No.629 of 2001 can be reviewed on grounds of error apparent on the face of record and overlooked evidence, nine years after the decree?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.R.Manjunatha Shetti
Varalakshmi (deceased) rep. by Power Agent Durai Raja
Rajanna
S.R.Manjuraj
T.V.Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
