Dismissed

Vellachi v. Arunachalam v Union of India

Madras HC15 Nov 2024REV.APLW/143/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this review application, the applicant sought to challenge an order dated 25.04.2024 in a writ petition. The additional public prosecutor submitted that the special leave petition filed by the respondent was withdrawn and the looked-out notice was deleted. Finding the grievance redressed, the court closed the review application without further adjudication.

What did the court decide?

The review application stands closed.

Vellachi v Arunachalam Vs Union of India — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Rev.Aplw.No.143 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 15.11.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

Review Application No.143 of 2024

¶7

Vellachi V Arunachalam

¶8

.. Review Applicant

¶9

¶10

Union of India rep by Ministry of Home Affairs Foreign Department Immigration Office North Block New Delhi 110 001

¶11

Inspector of Police Bank Fraud Wing Team XI, Central Crime Branch Vepery, Chennai 600 007

¶12

A.Muthu

¶13

.. Respondents

¶14

Memorandum of Grounds of Review Application filed under Order XLVII, Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Civil Procedure Code to review the order dated 25.04.2024 made in W.P.No.33856 of 2023.

¶15

For Review Applicant :: Mr.J.Ranjith Kumar for M/s Surana and Surana

¶16

_____________ Page 1 of 4_

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Rev.Aplw.No.143 of 2024

¶19

For Respondents :: Mr.D.Veerakumar for Mrs.J.Priscilla Pandian CGSC for R1 Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor for R2 Mr.M.Deivanandham for R3

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the second respondent would submit that the Special Leave Petition filed by the respondent had been withdrawn and thereafter, the lookout notice issued against the review applicant was deleted.

¶22

In view of the fact that the grievance of the petitioner has been

¶23

redressed, no further adjudication needs to be undertaken and consequently,

¶24

the review application stands closed. No costs.

¶25

Index : yes/no 15.11.2024 Neutral citation : yes/no ss

¶26

_____________ Page 2 of 4_

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Rev.Aplw.No.143 of 2024

¶29

¶30

The Immigration Officer Ministry of Home Affairs Foreign Department Immigration Office North Block New Delhi 110 001

¶31

The Inspector of Police Bank Fraud Wing Team XI, Central Crime Branch Vepery, Chennai 600 007

¶32

_____________ Page 3 of 4_

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

Rev.Aplw.No.143 of 2024

¶35

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.

¶36

¶37

Rev.Aplw.No.143 of 2024

¶38

15.11.2024

¶39

_____________ Page 4 of 4_

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Vellachi v. Arunachalam v Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vellachi v. Arunachalam v Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Samundeeswari Vs Dr.K.Narayanan and 2 others

Maathaiyan Vs a.Senthil kumar

E.Maharani, Vs S.Arun Raj, I.a.S., and another

T.Rajendran, Vs Rashmi Siddharth Zagade

M/s.Reco Process Pumps Vs M.G.Shanmuga Velayutham

A.Prabhu, Vs Mr. Madheshwaran