A contempt petition under the Contempt of Court Act was closed as the respondent filed an endorsement confirming compliance with the previous order dated 24.07.2023 in W.P.No.21762 of 2023, rendering further adjudication unnecessary.
The Contempt Petition stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.3277 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Cont.P.No.3277 of 2024
E.Maharani
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Mr.S.Arun Raj, I.A.S., The District Collector, Chengalpet District, Chengalpet – 603 001.
2.Mr.r.Rajendran The Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk, Chennai – 600 045.
...Respondents
PRAYER: Contempt Proceedings initiated under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order dated 24.07.2023 made in W.P.No.21762 of 2023.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Dhalapathy Vignesh Kumar
For Respondent : Mr.S.Balamurugan, Government Advocate
Page 1 of 4
Cont.P.No.3277 of 2024
ORDER
The present contempt Proceeding has been initiated to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order dated 24.07.2023 made in W.P.No.21762 of 2023.
would submit the order dated 24.07.2023 made in W.P.No.21762 of 2023
has been complied with and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court record.
4. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition stands closed.
08.11.2024
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No
Page 2 of 4
Cont.P.No.3277 of 2024
gd
To
Page 3 of 4
Cont.P.No.3277 of 2024
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
gd
Cont.P.No.3277 of 2024
08.11.2024
Page 4 of 4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
E.Maharani
Mr.S.Arun Raj
Mr.r.Rajendran
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
