K.Jeyakumar v. L.Arunachalam
Case brief
What is this about?
Madrasi High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition as infructuous on the ground that delivery of the subject property had already been effected.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P(MD).No.939 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 07.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
C.R.P(MD)No.939 of 2022 and C.M.P(MD)No.3731 of 2022
K.Jeyakumar ... Revision Petitioner / Respondent
Vs
L.Arunachalam ... Respondent / Petitioner
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of C.P.C., Constitution of India, to allow this Civil Revision Petition setting aside the order dated 07.12.2021 made in E.A.No.132 of 2019 in unnumbered E.A.No.--/2019 in E.P.No.123/2018 in R.C.O.P.No.23/2017 on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Madurai (Rent Control Authority).
For Petitioner : Mr.R.G.Shankarganesh
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Jeyakumar
- respondent
L.Arunachalam
Coram
G.ILANGOVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court