Allowed

P.Mariammal v. S.K.S.Premnath

Madras HC4 Mar 2024CRP(MD)/603/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a civil revision petition, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of the matter without respondent notice due to lack of adverse order. The court directed the lower court to dispose of a pending interlocutory application within 15 days, keeping execution proceedings in abeyance until its conclusion.

What did the court decide?

Direction to II Additional District Munsif, Madurai, to dispose of I.A.No.257 of 2022 within 15 days and keep execution proceedings in abeyance.

P.Mariammal Vs S.K.S.Premnath — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRP(MD).No. 603 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 04.03.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

¶6

CRP(MD).No.603 of 2024 and CMP(MD).No.2984 of 2024

¶7

P.Mariammal ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.S.K.S.Premnath 2.S.K.S.Sivananth 3.S.K.S.Ravichandran 4.S.K.S.Gopinath ... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER:- Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to call for the records in pursuance to the order passed in E.P.No.80 of 2022 in RCOP.No.39 of 2019 by the II Additional District Munsif, Madurai Town, dated 07.02.2024 and to set aside the same.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr. S. Selvakumar

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the

¶14

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

CRP(MD).No. 603 of 2024

¶16

order, dated 07.02.2024 passed in E.P.No.80 of 2022 in RCOP.No.39 of 2019 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif, Madurai Town.

¶17

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶18

Since no adverse order is passed against the respondents, notice to the respondents is not necessary.

¶19

There will be a direction to the learned I Additional District Munsif, Madurai to dispose of I.A.No.257 of 2022 pending on his file within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order since it is stated that pending Execution Proceedings, the above said application was taken by the revision petitioner. The execution proceeding and Interlocutory Application are pending before the separate Courts. Let the execution proceedings be kept in abeyance till the disposal of the above said Interlocutory Application. Depending upon the outcome of Interlocutory Application Proceedings, the execution proceedings be considered by the II Additional District Munsif, Madurai.

¶20

With the above observation, this Civil Revision Petiton is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition

¶21

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

CRP(MD).No. 603 of 2024

¶23

is closed.

¶24

04.03.2024

¶25

Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non Speaking order trp Note : Issue order copy on 06.03.2024

¶26

¶27

The II Additional District Munsif, Madurai Town.

¶28

The I Additional District Munsif, Madurai Town.

¶29

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

CRP(MD).No. 603 of 2024

¶31

G.ILANGOVAN,J.

¶32

Trp

¶33

CRP(MD).No.603 of 2024 and CMP(MD).No.2984 of 2024

¶34

04.03.2024

¶35

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

P.Mariammal v. S.K.S.Premnath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Mariammal v. S.K.S.Premnath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Sundarapandian Vs P.Rajeshwari

R.Ganesan Vs R.Rengasamy

Suresh Vs Shinu

R.Udhayachandrika Vs N.Porselvi

M.Basheer Vs N.Vasantha

Subi Kumar Vs Karuppaiah