Contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of an earlier order. The court was informed the enquiry on the petitioner's complaint was closed as a mistake of fact, and the contempt petition was closed with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P(MD).No.421 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 04.03.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
Cont.P.(MD).No.421 of 2024
Subi kumar
... Petitioner
Vs.
Karuppaiah
... Respondent
PRAYER:- Petition filed under Section 11 Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent herein for his wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD).No.19780 of 2023, dated 07.11.2023.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramsamy For Respondent : Mr.R.Sureskumar Government Advocate (Crl. side)
O R D E R
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned
Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submitted
that as per the direction of this Court made in Crl.O.P(MD).No.19780 of
1/3
Cont.P(MD).No.421 of 2024
2023, dated 07.11.2023 enquiry was undertaken on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner. After enquiry, it was closed as a mistake of fact.
the petitioner is aggrieved, he can work out the remedy through appropriate process.
04.03.2024
Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non Speaking order trp
2/3
Cont.P(MD).No.421 of 2024
G.ILANGOVAN,J.
Trp
Cont.P.(MD).No.421 of 2024
04.03.2024
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Subi kumar
Karuppaiah
G.Ilangovan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
