Allowed

S.Sivasamy v. Jawaharlal Nehru

Madras HC20 Dec 2024CRP(MD)/3200/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a direction for expeditious disposal of pending proceedings. Court directed the District Munsif/Judicial Magistrate to dispose of the E.P.No.2 of 2021 in O.S.No.17 of 2017 within two months of receiving the order.

What did the court decide?

The learned District Munsif/Judicial Magistrate, Ilayankudi was directed to dispose of E.P.No.2 of 2021 in O.S.No.17 of 2017 within two months of receiving a certified copy of this order.

S.Sivasamy Vs Jawaharlal Nehru — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P(MD)No.3200 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 20.12.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

¶6

C.R.P(MD)No.3200 of 2024

¶7

S.Sivasamy ... Petitioner

Vs.

1.Jawaharlal Nehru

2.Balan

... Respondents

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the learned District Munsif / Judicial Magistrate, Ilayankudi for expeditious disposal of E.P.No.2 of 2021 in O.S.No.17 of 2017 on his file, pending on his file, and allow this Civil Revision Petition and pass such further or other orders as this Court.

¶13

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan

¶14

1/5

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

C.R.P(MD)No.3200 of 2024

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking a direction to dispose of the E.P.No.2 of 2021 in O.S.No.17 of 2017 pending on the file of the learned District Munsif / Judicial Magistrate, Ilayankudi within a time stipulated by this Court.

¶19

2. According to the revision petitioner, the petitioner had filed the suit for the relief of declaration, recovery of possession and for mandatory injunction, which was decreed on 05.02.2018 and there was no appeal against the same. But continuous delay in the disposal of the original petition without any progress for more than two years causes serious prejudice. Hence, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.

¶20

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for petitioner. Since the

¶21

revision is filed for seeking early disposal, no notice is necessary to the respondent.

¶22

2/5

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

C.R.P(MD)No.3200 of 2024

¶25

4. Having been taken into consideration of the material facts and circumstances, this Court is of the view that in the interest of justice, a direction may be issued to the learned District Munsif / Judicial Magistrate, Ilayankudi, to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible.

¶26

5. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of with a direction to the learned District Munsif / Judicial Magistrate, Ilayankudi to dispose of the E.P.No.2 of 2021 in O.S.No.17 of 2017 pending on his file, within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order on merits and in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶27

20.12.2024

¶28

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR

¶29

3/5

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

C.R.P(MD)No.3200 of 2024

¶32

¶33

The District Munsif / Judicial Magistrate, Ilayankudi.

¶34

4/5

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

C.R.P(MD)No.3200 of 2024

¶37

K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.

¶38

BTR

¶39

Order made in C.R.P(MD)No.3200 of 2024

¶40

20.12.2024

¶41

5/5

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Sivasamy v. Jawaharlal Nehru

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Sivasamy v. Jawaharlal Nehru

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hemabai Ralizu Vs D. Iyappan

P.Sankar Vs R.K.Maheswari

Justin Joseph Vs Manikandan

Mohamed Abbas Vs Sivakumar

Kari Santhappan @ Chandran, Vs Amuldas

Rajalakshmi died Vs the District Collector