Disposed

Justin Joseph v. Manikandan

Madras HC19 Dec 2024CRP(MD)/3170/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision petitioners sought a direction for early disposal of a pending permanent injunction suit filed against them, alleging trespass and threats during pendency. The court disposed of the petition directing the District Munsif, Andipatti to decide the suit within six months on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to District Munsif, Andipatti to dispose of O.S.No.94 of 2021 within six months on merits; no notice issued; no costs.

Justin Joseph Vs Manikandan — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRP(MD).No.3170 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 19.12.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.R.P(MD)No.3170 of 2024

¶6

1.Justin Joseph 2.Beena Justin : Petitioners Vs. 1.Manikandan ... 1st Respondent / Plaintiff 2.S.Deivam 3.Alex Pandian 4.A.Rajeshwari ... 2 to 4 Respondents / 3 to 5 Defendants

¶7

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the learned District Munsif Court, Andipatti, to dispose of the O.S.No.94 of 2021 pending on its file, as expeditiously as possible.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Thayumanaswamy

¶9

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶10

CRP(MD).No.3170 of 2024

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking a direction to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.94 of 2021 on the file of the Learned District Munsif, Andipatti, within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶13

Heard the learned counsel appearing for petitioner. Since the

¶14

revision is filed for seeking early disposal, no notice is necessary to the respondents.

¶15

The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submitted that the above said suit has been filed by the first respondent / plaintiff for permanent injunction without any legal justification and in view of the pendency of the suit, rowdy elements are trespassing the revision petitioner's property and threatening them. Therefore, the said suit may be disposed of within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶16

Having been taken into consideration of the material facts and

¶17

circumstances and that the petitioner is facing trouble at the hands of the

¶18

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

CRP(MD).No.3170 of 2024

¶20

respondents herein, this Court is of the view that in the interest of justice, a direction may be issued to the learned District Munsif, Andipatti, to dispose of the said suit as expeditiously as possible.

¶21

Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned District Munsif, Andipatti, to dispose of the said suit O.S.No.94 of 2021 on his file within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order on merits and in accordance with law. No costs.

¶22

19.12.2024

¶23

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No

¶24

pnn

¶25

¶26

The District Munsif, Andipatti.

¶27

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

CRP(MD).No.3170 of 2024

¶29

K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.,

¶30

pnn

¶31

C.R.P(MD)No.3170 of 2024

¶32

19.12.2024

¶33

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Justin Joseph v. Manikandan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Justin Joseph v. Manikandan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Jayakumar, Vs S.Sivashanmugam

Karuthamani @ Karuppayee Vs Akkammal

Muthuvel Vs Sumathi

Marimuthu, Vs S. Mahalingam

M. Jeral Jeyaseelan Vs St.Antonys Church Committee

Santhanamariappan Vs Pushpaselvi